Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery ; (6): 468-470, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-499973

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of electronic flexible ureteroscope Holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2. 0 cm. Methods From October 2012 to December 2013,43 cases of kidney stones larger than 2. 0 cm in diam-eter were treated with holmium laser lithotripsy under electronic flexible ureteroscope. A double-J stent was indwelled in ureter for 1~2 weeks before operation in each patient. Ureteral catheter guide wire was firstly put into the ureter with F8. 0/9. 8 semi-rigid ureteroscope,and the ac-cess sheath was put along the wire. Then,the electronic flexible ureteroscope(Olympus V5) was introduced into the pelvis. Stones were frag-mented with holmium laser,and greater than 3 mm crushed stones were removed with a set of stone basket. Results The diameter of the stones of the 43 patients ranged from 2~3. 2 cm,with an average of 2. 4 cm. The operation time ranged from 35~120 min,with an average of 68 min. Three patients complicated with chills,fever and other symptoms of infection,who were improved by active anti-infective treatment. No serious complications occurred. Postoperative hospital stay was 2~4 d,with an average of 3. 2 d. After 12 weeks of follow-up,stone clearance rate was 86% (37/43). Conclusion It is safe and efficacy to treat kidney stones larger than 2. 0 cm with electronic flexible ureteroscope, especially for the elderly,solitary kidney,and patients with a previous incision or percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

2.
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery ; (6): 644-646, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-499949

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy ( FURL) using holmium laser for medullary sponge kidney stones. Methods A flexible ureteroscope was placed into renal calyx via a ureteral access sheath ( UAS) . The stones underlying the mucosa were found,and then broken by holmium laser following incision of renal papillary mucosa. The stone fragments were washed or clamped out. The remission of clinical symptoms and incidence of perioperative complications were observed,and a KUB plain film was rechecked postoperatively. Results Stones underlying mucosa were found and broken successfully in all 14 patients and there was no serious bleeding. Back pain symptoms of patients were relieved in 3 to 7 days postoperatively or after the removal of double J stent. The stone fragments were mainly discharged spontaneously. The rechecking KUB showed the amount of stones of most patients was significantly re-duced three months after operation. Conclusion FURL using holmium laser is effective for the treatment of medullary sponge kidney stones as it can significantly reduce the loads of stones without serious complications. It’ s a minimally invasive,effective,safe and suitable way which is suitable for further spread of clinical application.

3.
Chongqing Medicine ; (36): 1296-1298, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-448256

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URS) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL) for treating upper ureteral calculi by the randomized controlled clinical trial .Methods 120 cases of up-per ureteral calculi treated in this hospital from May to September 2013 were randomized into the F-URS group and the MPCNL group with 60 cases in each group .The postoperative clinical curative effects were compared between the two groups .Results The initial stone clearance rates of the F-URS group and the MPCNL group were 68 .33% and 95 .00% respectively ,and the difference was statistically significant (P0 .05) .The operating time of the F-URS group and the MPCNL group was (35 .33 ± 11 .57)min and (53 .75 ± 17 .31)min respectively ,the average hospital stay after operation was(3 .05 ± 0 .62)d and (5 .43 ± 1 .84)d respectively ,and the average visual analogue scale(VAS) score on first postoper-ative day was 1 .70 ± 1 .37 and 3 .68 ± 1 .57 respectively .These indicators had statistically significant differences between the two groups(P0 .05) .Conclusion For upper ureteral calculi with surgical indication ,the effect of F-URS is equivalence to MPCNL in the aspect of the stone clearance rate ,but F-URS has high-er security and shorter postoperative hospital stay .In the department with the condition to conduct F-URS ,F-URS should be ranked as the preferred treatment method for upper ureteral calculi .

4.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 576-580, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-427426

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( PCNL).Methods Patients who underwent PCNL were randomized into 2 groups by extracting a random number generated from random number table,tubeless PCNL group and traditional PCNL group when the stones were cleared.Each patient in tubeless PCNL group was treated with insertion of a F5 ureteral double pigtail stent without placement of nephrostomy tube,while both double pigtail stent and F16 nephrostomy tube were placed in patients in traditional PCNL group.Exclusion criteria were severe bleeding requiring blood transfusion,stone residual requring a second PCNL,severe hydronephrosis with the thickness of renal parenchyma less than 5 mm,pyonephrosis,stricture of ureter or ureteropelvic junction,and severe perforation of the collecting system.A total of 50 patients were enrolled in this study.Tubeless PCNL and traditional PNCL were performed in 25 patients,including 27 kidney units,respectively.The two groups had comparable demographic data.All the operations were performed by the same surgeon.Evaluation factors included postoperative pain,decreased hemoglobin,blood transfusion rate,incidence of fever and perirenal hematoma,and duration of hospitalization.Results The average visual analogue scale (VAS) score on postoperative day 1 in tubeless PCNL group was 2.24 compared with 5.04 in traditional PCNL group (P < 0.01 ).The average hospital stay in tubeless PC NL group (3.04 d) was significantly shorter than that in traditioal PCNL group (6.88 d) (P <0.01 ).The differences in average hemoglobin drop and stone clearance in the 2 groups were not significant.The differences between the 2 groups in blood transfusion ( 1/25 in tubeless PCNL group vs 3/25 in traditional PCNL group,P >0.05),renal hematomas rate (6/27 in tubeless PCNL group vs 7/27 in traditional PCNL group,P > 0.05) and fever rate (3/25 in tubeless PCNL group vs 4/25 in traditional PCNL group,P >0.05 ) were not significant.There was no incidence of urinary leakage from the nephrostomy site in the 2 groups.Conclusions Tubeless PCNL can significantly decrease postoperative pain and discomfort and shorten the duration of hospitalization without increase of complications.Tubeless PCNL is safe,effective and performable,but the contraindications such as massive haemorrhage,pyonephrosis,ureteral obstruction,severe perforation of the collecting system,residual stone requring a second PCNL,should be kept in mind.

5.
China Pharmacy ; (12)1991.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-518911

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To establish an optimal therapeutic window concentration of CsA trough levels in renal transplant recipients on triple immunosuppressants regimen METHODS:A total 1 874 samples from 268 renal transplant recipients were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay(FPIA) According to the duration after operation and clinical diagnoses ,the whole blood CsA trough levels were compared among subgroups RESULTS:The optimal therapeutic window concentration of CsA was 300~400?g/L(within 1 month after operation),250~350?g/L(2nd~3rd month),150~250?g/L(4th~6th month),100~200?g/L(7th~12th month)and 100~150?g/L(more than 12 months) CONCLUSION:The above mentioned therapeutic window concentratin of CsA trough levels was ideal for renal transplant recipients with no marked acute toxic effects and rejection reaction

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL